DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009188451-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-07-27

000120239

Contested design: 009188451-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holders must pay fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 009188451-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holders bear the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Paweł Marzec ‘Marec’via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Aleksandra Fredry 3, 23100 Bychawa, Poland

Represented by

Maciej Marian Priebe

Holder · RCD owner

Investigate Sp. z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Gustawa Morcinka 15 21, 31762 Krakówm Poland

Represented by

Anna Giercarz

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

LIVIVO dual-hook folding wall-mounted bicycle storage stand rack

ASIN B01 M1B PWON · www.amazon.co.uk · disclosed 2015-04-09

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier bicycle-rack designs disclosed online before the filing date, especially an Amazon.co.uk listing from 9 April 2015.
  • The holders were invited to respond but filed no observations and did not rebut the evidence of disclosure or the design comparison.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing as sufficient proof of public disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and found broad designer freedom apart from the need for a hook, wall holder, and fixing screws.
  • Because the compared bicycle wall racks were almost identical and the minor wall-holder differences did not alter the overall impression, the contested design lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.10

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131944

vs Jinsong Liu

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000128757

vs Axue Jin

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127246

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127279

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127243

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127245

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127244

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127241

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088