DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008814891-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-08-16

000121222

Contested design: 008814891-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application against registered Community design No 0088148910001 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0088148910001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Wuxi Wemade Healthcare Products Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

No.1060, Antai 3rd Road, Houqiao Street, Xishan District, Wuxi 214000, China

Represented by

Qiang Zhou

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Chengyi Textile Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

103, Bldg.T11, Huanan Intl. Textile & Garment Raw Materials Logistics Zone (Ph I), Hehua Com, Pinghu Str., Shenzhen, China

Represented by

A.BRE.MAR. S.R.L.

Prior art cited (1)

Prior use⚠ rejected as evidence

breast support tape / the applicant's product

MEDICA 2019 trade fair and related sales/review evidence

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested design lacked novelty and individual character over its earlier breast-support tape, relying on trade-fair photos, internal records, sales screenshots, test reports and customer reviews.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the applicant had not clearly identified the prior design within the evidence or explained how the exhibits proved its prior disclosure.
  • Chinese-language material without translation was disregarded, and the remaining evidence did not objectively prove public disclosure under Article 7 CDR.
  • The invalidity application was rejected as unfounded, and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder's fixed representation costs of EUR 400.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000123916

vs Crocs, Inc.

2024-11-18Art 25(1)(b)027
000123935

vs Crocs, Inc.

2024-11-18Art 25(1)(b)027
000120862

vs Dongguan Zhicheng Lighting Co., Ltd.

2024-11-06Art 25(1)(b)027
000122914

vs JSP Limited

2024-04-25Art 25(1)(b)027
000122915

vs JSP Limited

2024-04-25Art 25(1)(b)027
000121459

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-09Art 25(1)(b)027
000121479

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-08Art 25(1)(b)027
000121478

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-04Art 25(1)(b)027