DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002421149-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-10-25

000122216

Contested design: 002421149-0004

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, the contested registered Community design is declared invalid, and the holder is ordered to pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Se estima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad. 2. Se declara nulo el dibujo o modelo comunitario registrado n.º 002421149-0004. 3. Se condena al titular a que sufrague las costas del solicitante, que se fijan en 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

B.C.V. - Produtos de Manutenção Industrial e Serviços, LDA.via PDF extraction

Portugal (PT)

Rua Roberto Ivens Nº. 1 L8/9, 2910-719 Setúbal, Portugal

Represented by

Marquesmarcas

Holder · RCD owner

Sol i Vent Paisatjes, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Ronda Auguste y Louis Lumiere nº 31, 46980 Paterna, España

Represented by

Interlink Europe Consulting

Encarnación Arias Castellano

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Screenshot from a video showing ArborSystems coupling needle design for use with an injector-gun syringe.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lz-uPgybbK4 · YouTube / ArborSystems · disclosed 2011-02-18

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, relying on ArborSystems YouTube videos and screenshots allegedly disclosing the same coupling needle design before 10 March 2014.
  • The holder filed no observations and submitted no evidence in reply despite being given time to respond.
  • The Division accepted the publicly accessible YouTube video dated 18 February 2011 as prior disclosure under Article 7 CDR.
  • It found the prior design and the contested design identical in all relevant features, so the contested RCD lacked novelty.
  • The invalidity application was upheld in full, the RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131944

vs Jinsong Liu

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000128757

vs Axue Jin

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127246

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127279

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127243

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127245

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127244

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127241

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088