DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009142763-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-11-07

000121636

Contested design: 009142763-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 009142763-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Carl Freudenberg KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Höhnerweg 2-4, 69469 Weinheim, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Paweł Okrasiński

Poland (PL)

Dworska 5b/7, 15-756 Białystok, Poland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAttachment 2

Vileda Turbo 2in1 EasyWring Spin Mop head

www.kaufland.de product No 364416038 · www.kaufland.de · disclosed 2021-07-12

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on an earlier mop-head design disclosed online before the filing date.
  • Holder was invited to respond but filed no observations, so the invalidity application was undefended.
  • The Division accepted the Kaufland webpage screenshots and customer-review dates as sufficient proof of public disclosure from at least 12/07/2021.
  • Finding the prior and contested designs identical in all essential features, the Division held the contested design lacked novelty and declared it invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

04.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131844

vs Nanchang Wangxing Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000130166

vs Nanchang Wangxing Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000131548

vs Wenwei Ding

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000131585

vs NOVOWISE LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000129185

vs Wenzhou Lingzhan Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-09-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
0001288952025-07-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000127815

vs Daniel-Vasile Ilie

2025-05-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048