DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001484604-0007

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-11-10

000120410

Contested design: 001484604-0007

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità del disegno o modello comunitario registrato n. 001486781-0007 è respinta. 2. La richiedente sopporta l’onere delle spese del titolare, fissate a 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Palini Vernici s.r.l.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via San Gerolamo, 14, 25055 Pisogne (BS) Italia

Holder · RCD owner

Ver Plast s.r.l.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Palera, 50, 10040 Leini (Torino) Italia

Prior art cited (6)

Prior useD1-D6⚠ rejected as evidence

orders and invoices for purchases of colour sample plates of various sizes

purchase orders and invoices

Web disclosureD7⚠ rejected as evidence

FIAT 500 colour search results for model years 2019-2021

https://www.vernicispray.com/cerca_colore.jsp · vernicispray.com

Web disclosureD8⚠ rejected as evidence

Wikipedia RAL colour scale page with alleged similar grey colours

https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAL_(scala_di_colori) · Wikipedia · disclosed 2022-09-28

PublicationD9⚠ rejected as evidence

report on the popularity of automotive colours in 2021

Global Automotive 2021 Color Popularity Report · report publication

OtherD10⚠ rejected as evidence

sheet showing selected Pantone colours

OtherD11⚠ rejected as evidence

document showing eight rows of coloured sample plates

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(a)Article 25(1)(b)Article 3(a)Article 3(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested design was not a proper product and in any event lacked individual character because colour sample plates for cars had long been used in the trade.
  • The holder replied that the protected product was automotive paint for plastic vehicle components, that the relevant appearance was defined by the deposited samples, and that the informed user would perceive a different overall impression.
  • The Division held that the protected subject matter had to be assessed from the registered representation, which showed a coloured rectangular plate corresponding to decorative accessories for vehicles and therefore a product under Article 3.
  • It also found that none of the alleged earlier designs or materials had been proven disclosed before filing, so the claim of lack of individual character failed under Article 7.
  • The invalidity application was rejected in full, and the applicant was ordered to reimburse the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.16

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000120480

vs VER PLAST S.r.l.

2023-11-13Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a)129
000120409

vs VER PLAST S.r.l.

2023-11-10Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a)129
000128826

vs Shenzhen Lireder Industrial Co., Ltd.

2025-08-18Art 25(1)(b)127
000120579

vs Lohia e-mobility GmbH

2025-03-12Art 25(1)(b)127
000120158

vs elobau GmbH & Co. KG

2023-11-10Art 25(1)(b)127
000118721

vs HANGZHOU CHIC INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD

2023-10-16Art 25(1)(b)127
000118758

vs HANGZHOU CHIC INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD

2023-10-16Art 25(1)(b)127
000118360

vs Wang-Chuan CHEN

2023-08-03Art 25(1)(b)127