DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015009327-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-01-24

000121814

Contested design: 015009327-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay costs fixed at EUR 350.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015009327-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 350.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Carl Freudenberg KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Höhnerweg 2-4, 69469 Weinheim, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Mama Margaret sp. z o.o. sp.k.

Poland (PL)

Trzmiela 2, 60-185 Skórzewo Poland

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

mops (accessories for -)

RCD No 0009142763-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2022-08-12

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested mop design lacked novelty and individual character because earlier mop designs had already been disclosed before the filing date.
  • The holder replied that the compared designs were different and asked the Office to reject the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted publication of earlier RCD No 0009142763-0001 in the Community Designs Bulletin as prior disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • It found the compared designs identical apart from immaterial details, held that the contested design lacked novelty, and upheld the application with costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

04.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131844

vs Nanchang Wangxing Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000130166

vs Nanchang Wangxing Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000131548

vs Wenwei Ding

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000131585

vs NOVOWISE LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000129185

vs Wenzhou Lingzhan Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-09-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
0001288952025-07-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000127815

vs Daniel-Vasile Ilie

2025-05-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048