DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008556815-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-02-08

000119818

Contested design: 008556815-0002

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant is ordered to bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Se desestima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad del dibujo o modelo comunitario registrado n.º 008556815-0002. 2. Se condena al solicitante a que sufrague las costas del titular, fijadas en 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Antoni Pons, S.A.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Can Pau Birol, 32 - Pol. Ind. Max Xirgu, 17005 Gerona, España

Represented by

Pons IP, S.A.

Holder · RCD owner

Andrés Machado Sanmartín

Spain (ES)

Calle Segovia, 43 - 4º planta, puerta 3, 03195 Los Arenales del Sol (Alicante) España

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

MONA-FR slipper design

https://www.instagram.com/p/CFkWRuUnPCq/ · Instagram / Toni Pons · disclosed 2020-09-25

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, relying on the earlier MONA-FR slipper design as D1.
  • Holder contested public disclosure of D1, challenged the sufficiency of the evidence, and argued the contested design created a different overall impression.
  • The Division admitted the later-filed corroborating evidence and found D1 had been publicly disclosed before the contested design's filing date.
  • Despite some similarities, the Division found significant differences in silhouette, color scheme, and sole design, so the contested design retained individual character and the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000123916

vs Crocs, Inc.

2024-11-18Art 25(1)(b)027
000123935

vs Crocs, Inc.

2024-11-18Art 25(1)(b)027
000120862

vs Dongguan Zhicheng Lighting Co., Ltd.

2024-11-06Art 25(1)(b)027
000122914

vs JSP Limited

2024-04-25Art 25(1)(b)027
000122915

vs JSP Limited

2024-04-25Art 25(1)(b)027
000121459

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-09Art 25(1)(b)027
000121479

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-08Art 25(1)(b)027
000121478

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-04Art 25(1)(b)027