DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008556815-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-02-08

000119838

Contested design: 008556815-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity against Registered Community design No 008556815-0001 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Se desestima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad del dibujo o modelo comunitario registrado n.º 008556815-0001. 2. Se condena al solicitante a que sufrague las costas del titular, fijadas en 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Antoni Pons, S.A.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Can Pau Birol, 32 - Pol. Ind. Max Xirgu, 17005 Gerona, España

Represented by

Pons IP, S.A.

Holder · RCD owner

Andrés Machado Sanmartín

Spain (ES)

Calle Segovia, 43 - 4º planta, puerta 3, 03195 Los Arenales del Sol (Alicante) España

Prior art cited (1)

Prior useD1

slippers / house shoes model MONA-FR

MONA-FR · Instagram / Toni Pons winter 2020 catalog · disclosed 2020-09-25

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, relying on the earlier MONA-FR slipper design D1 and evidence including a 2020 catalog, orders, and social-media posts.
  • The holder argued the disclosure evidence was insufficient, commercialization was unproven, and D1 did not deprive the contested design of individual character.
  • The Division admitted the later-filed supplemental evidence, found D1 had been publicly disclosed before the filing date, and compared the designs from the perspective of the informed user.
  • Despite similarities in the upper and sole profile, the contested design's rear flap, striking color scheme, and distinctive sole branding created a different overall impression, so the invalidity application was dismissed.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000123916

vs Crocs, Inc.

2024-11-18Art 25(1)(b)027
000123935

vs Crocs, Inc.

2024-11-18Art 25(1)(b)027
000120862

vs Dongguan Zhicheng Lighting Co., Ltd.

2024-11-06Art 25(1)(b)027
000122914

vs JSP Limited

2024-04-25Art 25(1)(b)027
000122915

vs JSP Limited

2024-04-25Art 25(1)(b)027
000121459

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-09Art 25(1)(b)027
000121479

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-08Art 25(1)(b)027
000121478

vs Birkenstock IP GmbH

2024-04-04Art 25(1)(b)027