DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008520944-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-02-19

000121914

Contested design: 008520944-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008520944-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Business Trade Consulting Społka Z Ograniczoną Odpowiedzialnosciąvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Jagiellonska, nr 2B, 38-400 Krosno, Poland

Represented by

Agnieszka Nowosielska

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Ruilang Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

201, 2F, D6, District 6, Longquan Villa, Longgang Avenue, Nanwan Street, Longgang District, Shenzhen, China

Represented by

Ákos Süle

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAppendix 2

Lansky Sharpeners Lpuck Dual Grit Multi-Purpose Sharpener

https://www.amazon.de (ASIN B 017 T2G G6I) · Amazon.de · disclosed 2017-05-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested whetstone design lacked novelty and individual character in light of earlier website disclosures, including an Amazon listing predating the filing date.
  • The holder was invited to respond but filed no observations in the invalidity proceedings.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing as prior public disclosure and found the prior design and contested design nearly identical in shape, proportions, thickness, and surface structure.
  • Given the designer’s broad freedom and only minor colour differences, the Division found no different overall impression and declared the contested design invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131944

vs Jinsong Liu

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000128757

vs Axue Jin

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127246

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127279

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127243

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127245

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127244

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127241

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088