DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008283592-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-02-26

000121854

Contested design: 008283592-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application inadmissible

The invalidity application is rejected as inadmissible, and the invalidity fee will not be refunded.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected as inadmissible. 2. The fee for the application for a declaration of invalidity will not be refunded.

CostsNo costs order

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Clic-and-Get GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Am Gewerbehof 8, 50170 Kerpen, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Zhenhua Sun

China (CN)

No. 0003, Group 8 of Kangzhangzi Village, Shanzuizi Town, Harqin Left Mongolian Autonomous County, Liaoning Province, China

Represented by

Asternery S.L

Prior art cited (1)

Prior use

another product allegedly already available on the market since 2007

Legal grounds invoked

Article 28(1)(b)(i)Article 28(1)(b)(vi)Article 52(2)Article 30(1)Article 30(2)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought removal of the contested design from the register.
  • After an invitation to remedy deficiencies, the applicant argued only that another product had been on the market since 2007 and again requested deletion.
  • The holder filed no observations recorded in the decision; the case turned on admissibility defects in the application.
  • The Division found no invalidity ground was identified and no reasoned statement of facts, evidence, and arguments was provided, so Article 28 and Article 52 requirements were unmet.
  • The application was rejected as inadmissible and the invalidity fee was not refunded.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000125335

vs Digikor Oy

2025-02-11Art 25(1)(b)237
000120318

vs BIODOM EUROPE S.R.L.

2023-10-10Art 25(1)(b)237
000120199

vs William Huang

2023-05-30Art 25(1)(b)237
000116628

vs DCX POLSKA Sp. z o.o.

2023-01-13Art 25(1)(b)237
000118242

vs TAIZHOU WEIYE REFRIGERATION EQUIPMENT CO.,LTD

2022-11-03Art 25(1)(b)237
000114601

vs fire friends GmbH & Co. KG

2022-03-23Art 25(1)(b)237
000114903

vs CERAMICA CIELO S.p.A.

2022-03-18Art 25(1)(b)237
000114781

vs CERAMICA CIELO S.p.A.

2022-03-02Art 25(1)(b)237