DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015029375-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-05-31

000124419

Contested design: 015029375-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015029375-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Elm & Neudecker GbRvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Am Sandberg 8, 60599 Frankfurt, Germany

Represented by

Lexea Rechtsanwälte

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhenshi Tongmuhe Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

1107, Building A, Weidonglong Business Building, No. 2125 Meilong Avenue, Tsinghua Community, Longhua, Shenzhen, China

Represented by

Jesús Eladio Sánchez Silva

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

URAQT Children's Birthday Crown

https://www.amazon.de; ASIN B 09L M2H P1M · Amazon.de · disclosed 2021-11-11

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested party-decoration design lacked novelty and individual character because an almost identical product had been sold online before the filing date.
  • The applicant relied on an Amazon.de offer for the 'URAQT Children's Birthday Crown' with ASIN B 09L M2H P1M, shown as available since 11/11/2021.
  • The holder filed no observations, so it did not challenge disclosure or the comparison with the prior design.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing as sufficient internet disclosure and found the compared designs identical in all relevant visible features.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked novelty under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Articles 4(1) and 5(1)(b) CDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

11.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130246

vs Giuliana FERRAROTTI

2026-05-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000131904

vs Lang Huang

2026-04-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000126958

vs Anna Krystyniak

2025-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000126957

vs Anna Krystyniak

2025-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000126956

vs Anna Krystyniak

2025-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000126975

vs Anna Krystyniak

2025-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000127536

vs Shuxun Dai

2025-03-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118
000124515

vs Heinrich Braun

2025-03-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)118