DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015043301-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-07-16

000124437

Contested design: 015043301-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0150433010001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Guangzhou Weijia Technology Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 301, Workshop J, No. 567, East Rd., Cheng’ao Ave., Aotou Town, Conghua Dist., Guangzhou 510940, China

Represented by

Tong Yang Slu

Holder · RCD owner

Lovio Marketing Management Limited

United Kingdom (GB)

Flat 43 Perkins House, Wallwood Street, London E14 7AH, United Kingdom

Represented by

Berk Gokhan

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Protective Caps for Chair Legs offered by the Cocolemon store on www.amazon.de

ASIN B 0BZ CT6 75J · www.amazon.de · disclosed 2023-03-23

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested floor-protector design lacked novelty and individual character because a nearly identical product had been disclosed earlier on Amazon.
  • The applicant relied on an Amazon.de printout showing Protective Caps for Chair Legs with ASIN B 0BZ CT6 75J available since 23/03/2023.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the online retail evidence sufficient, held the designs created the same overall impression on the informed user, and found no meaningful distinction beyond felt colour.
  • The application was upheld and the contested design was declared invalid for lack of individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.99

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131944

vs Jinsong Liu

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000128757

vs Axue Jin

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127246

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127279

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127243

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127245

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127244

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127241

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088