DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008542377-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-07-24

000124996

Contested design: 008542377-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 008542377-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Olsen Store GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Lise-Meitner-Str. 10, 22941 Bargteheide, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Dingzhen Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

3E052, Bldg 2, Phase 2, South China International Printing Paper Packaging Logistics Zone, No.1 Huanan Avenue, Pinghu Street, Longgang District, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China

Represented by

Tong Yang Slu

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureprior design 1⚠ rejected as evidence

stickers (set of -) / Pack of 198 Self-Adhesive labels

Amazon ASIN B 01M 27L F1T · Amazon

Web disclosureprior design 2⚠ rejected as evidence

stickers (set of -) / Savvy&Sorted 96 Labels

Amazon ASIN B07 8J7 SK8W · Amazon

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant claimed the contested sticker design lacked novelty and individual character over two earlier sticker sets allegedly sold on Amazon before the filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division held the Amazon evidence was insufficient because the extracts did not themselves show complete source, date, and representation details needed to prove disclosure.
  • Because effective prior disclosure was not established, the invalidity grounds under Article 25(1)(b) CDR failed and the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

19.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129182

vs Guangzhou L-TEK Enterprise Co.,Ltd

2025-09-25Art 25(1)(b)197
000118059

vs LABEL PRINT SRL

2022-10-04Art 25(1)(b)197
000118058

vs LABEL PRINT SRL

2022-10-04Art 25(1)(b)197
000118060

vs LABEL PRINT SRL

2022-10-03Art 25(1)(b)197
000118039

vs LABEL PRINT SRL

2022-10-03Art 25(1)(b)197
000117433

vs Shenzhen Liwei Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.

2022-06-30Art 25(1)(b)197
000115203

vs CreativaMente SRL

2022-03-18Art 25(1)(b)197
000115221

vs CreativaMente SRL

2022-03-18Art 25(1)(b)197