DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015053142-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-08-27

000125255

Contested design: 015053142-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015053142-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Carl Freudenberg KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Höhnerweg 2-4, 69469 Weinheim, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Mama Margaret sp. z o.o. sp.k.

Poland (PL)

Trzmiela 2, 60-185 Skórzewo, Poland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

'vileda SPIN & CLEAN' mop head / corresponding part of mop

ASIN B082DW7B3K · www.amazon.de · disclosed 2019-12-07

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, arguing the contested mop-head part was identical to the corresponding part of the earlier vileda SPIN & CLEAN mop disclosed on Amazon in 2019.
  • The applicant filed two Amazon.de printouts concerning the vileda SPIN & CLEAN mop, while the holder filed no observations in reply to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon evidence as proving public disclosure before the filing date and found the second printout showed the same product despite lacking the ASIN.
  • It held the compared designs identical in all essential features, found the contested design lacked novelty under Article 5 CDR, upheld the application, and invalidated the RCD.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

04.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131844

vs Nanchang Wangxing Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000130166

vs Nanchang Wangxing Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000131548

vs Wenwei Ding

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000131585

vs NOVOWISE LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000129185

vs Wenzhou Lingzhan Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-09-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
0001288952025-07-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000127815

vs Daniel-Vasile Ilie

2025-05-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048