DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008543813-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-11-19

000124436

Contested design: 008543813-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters Nr. 008543813-0001 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Qinglian Chenvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

58 Shanglian Village, Xinnan Village Committee, Yangchun City, Guangdong Province 529619, Volksrepublik China

Represented by

Konstantin Tahtadjiev

Holder · RCD owner

Ziel Home Furnishing Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

No. 198-19 Songshan South Road, Dongfang Building 6F, Suite 601, Erqi District, Zhengzhou City, Zhengzhou 450015 Volksrepublik China

Represented by

Yi Kong

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

mailbox marketed as SONGMICS

ASIN B08L81K2P4 · Amazon.de · disclosed 2021-01-14

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty based on D1, an Amazon-listed SONGMICS mailbox disclosed before the RCD filing date.
  • The holder argued D1 fell within the Article 7(2) grace period because it was marketed by its subsidiary EUZIEL on the holder's instructions.
  • The Division accepted that D1 was publicly disclosed on 14 January 2021 but found that disclosure attributable to the holder within the 12-month grace period.
  • Because D1 had to be disregarded for novelty, the Article 25(1)(b) invalidity claim failed and the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000128596

vs Griptel AB

2025-07-17Art 25(1)(b)257
000121138

vs TABB Interior Systems B.V.

2024-01-15Art 25(1)(b)257
000121100

vs TABB Interior Systems B.V.

2024-01-15Art 25(1)(b)257
000121099

vs TABB Interior Systems B.V.

2024-01-15Art 25(1)(b)257
000120379

vs Ergosafe Aktiebolag

2023-10-26Art 25(1)(b)257
000120958

vs Yimei Zhu

2023-07-27Art 25(1)(b)257
000119859

vs BoZarc

2023-06-02Art 25(1)(b)257
000117077

vs Budotechnika Sp. o.o.

2022-12-13Art 25(1)(b)257