DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015045120-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-02-25

000126099

Contested design: 015045120-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 015045120-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Mohamar Jamouvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Strada Mihai Eminescu Nr. 25, Sat Afumati, Comuna Afumati, Judet Ilfov, Romania

Represented by

Elena Grecu

Holder · RCD owner

Izvor Comercial Invest SRLvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Str. CPT. Juverdeanu, Nr. 45, Biroul Nr.1, Sectorul 2, Bucuresti, Romania

Represented by

Cristian Nastase

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

fruit jellies

RCD No 008663439-0003 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2021-10-19

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier RCD No 008663439-0003 for fruit jellies.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier RCD and found high designer freedom for fruit gums, but considered the bunny-head top gum, colours, arrangement, and surface features materially different.
  • Because the contested design created a different overall impression and was not identical to the prior design, the invalidity grounds failed and the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberCristina SENERIO LLOVET
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

01.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124475

vs Tomasz Gotszlik

2025-01-21Art 25(1)(b)017
000103959

vs Grzegorz Wojdak

2019-10-16Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)017
000010762

vs J.R. Simplot Company

2019-04-08Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)017
000010765

vs J.R. Simplot Company

2019-04-08Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)017
000010771

vs J.R. Simplot Company

2019-04-08Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)017
000010769

vs J.R. Simplot Company

2019-04-08Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)017
000010766

vs J.R. Simplot Company

2019-04-08Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)017
000010764

vs J.R. Simplot Company

2019-04-08Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)017