DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009049430-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-04-03

000125956

Contested design: 009049430-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 009049430-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Gregory Frankenvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Hillewalser Str. 110, 32052, Herford, Germany

Represented by

Lexea Rechtsanwälte

Holder · RCD owner

Yaping Yu

China (CN)

Zhaixi village, Jiangnan Town, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000, China

Represented by

Andrea Albert Catala

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

polishing brush offered on Amazon.de

ASIN B01M68NIN5 · Amazon.de · disclosed 2016-10-23

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested polishing-brush design was not new and lacked individual character over a near-identical wire brush disclosed online in October 2016.
  • The applicant relied on an Amazon.de listing showing a polishing brush with ASIN B01M68NIN5 available since 23 October 2016; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing as sufficient disclosure under Article 7 and found the informed user would perceive the designs as producing the same overall impression.
  • Because the shared cup shape, central hole and symmetrically attached braided wires dominated, the minor hole-pattern and colour differences did not confer individual character.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to bear the costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

04.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131844

vs Nanchang Wangxing Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000130166

vs Nanchang Wangxing Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000131548

vs Wenwei Ding

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000131585

vs NOVOWISE LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000129185

vs Wenzhou Lingzhan Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-09-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
0001288952025-07-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048
000127815

vs Daniel-Vasile Ilie

2025-05-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)048