DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004731347-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-06-25

000124778

Contested design: 004731347-0004

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered EU design No 0047313470004 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Airtechnic - Chatzoudis Etaireia Periorismenis Euthynisvia PDF extraction

GR

Nea Chalkidona, Athens, Greece

Holder · RCD owner

D.Ellinas Factory Products LTDvia PDF extraction

CY

Limassol, Cyprus

Represented by

Konstantina Diola

Prior art cited (3)

CatalogD1

square wall access panel with metal frame

holder's 'P.V.C. products 2015' catalogue · disclosed 2015-12-31

CatalogD2

square access panel shown in KNAUF catalogue

KNAUF Drywall Systems catalogue · disclosed 2007-09-30

CatalogD3⚠ rejected as evidence

EUROFIRST access panel design

EUROFIRST two-page leaflet

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over D1-D3 and argued that the rear springs were solely dictated by technical function.
  • The holder disputed public disclosure, invoked the Article 7 grace period for its own earlier design, and maintained the contested design had individual character and non-functional aesthetic features.
  • The Division excluded only the rear springs as functional, accepted disclosure of D1 and D2 but not D3, and found D1 did not destroy novelty and D2 did not create the same overall impression.
  • The invalidity application was rejected in full, and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder's fixed representation costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130245

vs G.B.S., s.r.o.

2026-01-20Art 25(1)(b)257
000130202

vs SC PAMABA SRL

2025-12-16Art 25(1)(b)257
000127997

vs Peng Zhang

2025-12-15Art 25(1)(b)257
000127959

vs Peng Zhang

2025-12-15Art 25(1)(b)257
000127935

vs Saunasell OÜ

2025-11-07Art 25(1)(b)257
000127897

vs Saunasell OÜ

2025-11-07Art 25(1)(b)257
000127898

vs Saunasell OÜ

2025-10-20Art 25(1)(b)257
000124782

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25Art 25(1)(b)257