DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009070451-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-07-04

000128179

Contested design: 009070451-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 009070451-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

4u Retailvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

La Ville-du-bois, France

Represented by

Julien Riant

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Jiaxiye Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Shenzhen, China

Represented by

H&A

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosure

SDRTOP Vacuum Suction Cup offered on Amazon

https://www.amazon.co.uk; ASIN B 09L H1J 4FZ · Amazon.co.uk · disclosed 2021-11-10

Other

another earlier design invoked in the application but not specified in the decision text

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier disclosed suction cup vacuum lifter designs, relying in particular on an Amazon product listing dated 10/11/2021.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon printout as sufficient internet disclosure and found the designer's freedom not severely limited for this product category.
  • Comparing the shared form, handle, gauge placement, and overall configuration, the Division found no different overall impression and declared the contested design invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131944

vs Jinsong Liu

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000128757

vs Axue Jin

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127246

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127279

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127243

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127245

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127244

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127241

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088