DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015035965-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-08-18

000127157

Contested design: 015035965-0003

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 0150359650003 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Arika s.r.o.via PDF extraction

SK

Nižná, Slovakia

Represented by

BDO Legal s. r. o.

Holder · RCD owner

McLLOYD’S s.r.o.via PDF extraction

SK

Marcelová, Slovakia

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

BioSaurus snack depicted on packaging shown in a Lidl Slovakia leaflet

https://www.letak.sk · letak.sk / Lidl supermarkets in Slovakia · disclosed 2021-07-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested dinosaur-shaped snack design lacked novelty and individual character because the holder had disclosed the same design years before filing through publicly available product material.
  • The holder disputed prior disclosure and argued that differences in the mouth, legs, tail and curvature gave the contested design a different overall impression, especially given constraints in snack production.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted the dated online leaflet evidence as a valid prior disclosure and found the informed user would see both designs as essentially the same despite minor shape variations.
  • The Division concluded that the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6 and declared the design invalid, with costs awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

01.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126695

vs IKOONA SP. Z O.O.

2025-10-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000127155

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000127156

vs McLLOYD'S s.r.o.

2025-08-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126116

vs IZVOR COMERCIAL INVEST SRL

2025-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000120413

vs Hristo Shiderov

2025-02-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126097

vs EYADA GLOBAL SYSTEM GROUP

2024-10-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018
000126096

vs EYADA GLOBAL SYSTEM GROUP

2024-10-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)018