DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004074763-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-08-28

000126617

Contested design: 004074763-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected, and the applicants must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen EU-Geschmacksmusters Nr. 004074763-0001 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerinnen tragen die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

KWB Germany GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Stuhr, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

iFixit GmbH

Germany (DE)

Stuttgart, Deutschland

Represented by

KPW PartmbB

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

Amazon listing for an iFixit Pro Tech Toolkit showing a tool mat and lid

https://www.amazon.com/ifixit-pro-tech-toolkit.electronics/dp/B01GF0KV6G/; ASIN B01GF0KV6G · amazon.com · disclosed 2015-11-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(a)Article 3(1)Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicants argued the contested design lacked individual character, was dictated solely by technical function, and was not a single design because the views were inconsistent.
  • The holder disputed disclosure of D1, maintained the compared designs created different overall impressions, denied exclusive technical functionality, and said the seven views all came from the same 3D file.
  • The Division found the design was not exclusively technically dictated, because colour and the arrangement of recesses reflected design choices and alternative configurations were possible.
  • The Division accepted D1 as publicly disclosed from 21 November 2015, but held the contested design produced a different overall impression and therefore retained individual character; the invalidity application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000125596

vs DECATHLON

2026-02-06Art 25(1)(b)037
000125603

vs DECATHLON

2026-02-06Art 25(1)(b)037
000125639

vs DECATHLON

2026-02-06Art 25(1)(b)037
000125557

vs DECATHLON

2026-02-06Art 25(1)(b)037
000125601

vs DECATHLON

2026-02-06Art 25(1)(b)037
000125555

vs DECATHLON

2026-02-05Art 25(1)(b)037
000125597

vs DECATHLON

2026-02-05Art 25(1)(b)037
000125556

vs DECATHLON

2026-02-05Art 25(1)(b)037