DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015065380-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-10-03

000129261

Contested design: 015065380-0005

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015065380-0005 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Sturm Handels GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Rottenburg am Neckar, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

"Militaria Lodz.pl" Marek Dziekanskivia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Łódź, Poland

Represented by

Slawomir Budzik

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureExhibit 3

MIL-TEC combat knife with saw and sheath

https://www.recon-company.com · Internet Archive / recon-company.com · disclosed 2024-05-18

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on a prior MIL-TEC combat knife with saw and sheath disclosed before the filing date.
  • The applicant submitted Internet Archive printouts from recon-company.com archived on 18 May 2024; the holder filed no objections on disclosure.
  • The Division found the web evidence sufficient under Article 7(1) EUDR and treated the prior knife design as made available to the public before filing.
  • Given at least average designer freedom, the shared blade, serrations, ringed handle, guard, and sheath features dominated; minor guard and sheath-cord differences did not change the overall impression.
  • The contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) EUDR, so the application was upheld and the design declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131944

vs Jinsong Liu

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000128757

vs Axue Jin

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127246

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127279

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127243

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127245

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127244

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127241

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088