DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015012242-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-12-03

000130083

Contested design: 015012242-0002

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application against registered EU design No 015012242-0002 is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder’s costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(fr)

1. La demande en nullité à l’encontre du dessin ou modèle de l’UE enregistré nº 015012242-0002 est rejetée. 2. La demanderesse supporte les frais de la titulaire, fixés à 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Amel Touihrivia PDF extraction

AE

Dubaï, Émirats arabes unis

Represented by

Fidal

Holder · RCD owner

Edita Avakian

France (FR)

Paris, France

Represented by

IP Sphere

Prior art cited (3)

PatentD1

couvre-sac / housse de sac

US 7,628,187 B2 · United States patent document · disclosed 2009-12-08

National designD2⚠ rejected as evidence

handbag protective cover design

Canadian design No 128 738 · DesignView

Registered RCDD3

protective cover / bag cover

RCD No 006433306-0022 · EU Designs Bulletin / DesignView · disclosed 2019-08-02

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested bag cover was dictated entirely by technical function, lacked novelty over US patent D1, and lacked individual character over earlier cover designs.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the evidence did not show that all appearance features were solely technically dictated, noting wide borders, diamond openings, and a rigid side fold with no obvious technical necessity.
  • D1 and D3 were accepted as prior disclosures, D2 was not proven published, and the contested design created a different overall impression and was not identical to D1.
  • The invalidity application was rejected in full and the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 400 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberJessica N. LEWIS
  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
frFrenchoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000125601

vs DECATHLON

2026-02-06Art 25(1)(b)037
000125639

vs DECATHLON

2026-02-06Art 25(1)(b)037
000125603

vs DECATHLON

2026-02-06Art 25(1)(b)037
000125596

vs DECATHLON

2026-02-06Art 25(1)(b)037
000125557

vs DECATHLON

2026-02-06Art 25(1)(b)037
000125597

vs DECATHLON

2026-02-05Art 25(1)(b)037
000125555

vs DECATHLON

2026-02-05Art 25(1)(b)037
000125556

vs DECATHLON

2026-02-05Art 25(1)(b)037