DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015012242-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-12-03

000130124

Contested design: 015012242-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application against EU design No 015012242-0001 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder’s costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(fr)

1. La demande en nullité à l’encontre du dessin ou modèle de l’UE enregistré nº 015012242-0001 est rejetée. 2. La demanderesse supporte les frais de la titulaire, fixés à 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Amel Touihrivia PDF extraction

AE

Dubaï, Émirats arabes unis

Represented by

Fidal

Holder · RCD owner

Edita Avakian

France (FR)

Paris, France

Represented by

IP Sphere

Prior art cited (3)

PatentD1

bag cover shown in drawing 1

US 7,628,187 B2 · US patent · disclosed 2009-12-08

National designD2⚠ rejected as evidence

bag cover

Canadian design No 128 738 · DesignView

Registered RCDD3

bag cover

EU design No 006433306-0022 · EU Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2019-08-02

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 8(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested bag cover was dictated solely by technical function and also lacked novelty and individual character over D1 to D3.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the applicant had not proved all appearance features were exclusively technically dictated, and accepted disclosure only for D1 and D3.
  • Comparing the contested design with D1 and D3, the Division found a different overall impression and rejected the invalidity application in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberJessica N. LEWIS
  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000125601

vs DECATHLON

2026-02-06Art 25(1)(b)037
000125639

vs DECATHLON

2026-02-06Art 25(1)(b)037
000125603

vs DECATHLON

2026-02-06Art 25(1)(b)037
000125596

vs DECATHLON

2026-02-06Art 25(1)(b)037
000125557

vs DECATHLON

2026-02-06Art 25(1)(b)037
000125597

vs DECATHLON

2026-02-05Art 25(1)(b)037
000125555

vs DECATHLON

2026-02-05Art 25(1)(b)037
000125556

vs DECATHLON

2026-02-05Art 25(1)(b)037