DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015022882-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-12-19

000130282

Contested design: 015022882-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered EU design No 015022882 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità del disegno o modello dell'UE registrato n.- 015022882 è respinta. 2. Il richiedente sopporta l'onere delle spese del titolare, fissate a 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Jiongfeng Linvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Shenzhen City, provincia di Guangdong, Cina

Holder · RCD owner

Xiaodong Shaovia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Jiuto City, provincia di Jiangxi, Cina

Represented by

H & A

Prior art cited (6)

Registered RCDD1

clothes hooks

EU design registration No 015012585-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2023-03-10

National designD2

textile hooks, namely hooks

UK design registration No 6252078 · UK Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2023-01-10

National designD3

clothes hooks

German registered design No 402021203691-0001 · German Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2022-06-17

National designD4

clothes hooks

UK design registration No 6218759 · UK Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2022-08-07

National designD5

textile hangers, textile hooks

UK design registration No 6112662 · UK Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2021-03-04

National designD6

hooks

UK design registration No 6263830 · UK Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2023-03-03

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 5(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested design lacked novelty because earlier designs D1 to D6 had already made the same or nearly identical clothes-hook design available to the public.
  • The holder, although invited to comment on the invalidity application, filed no observations.
  • The Division held that all cited designs had been validly disclosed before 26 May 2023 through EU, German, and UK design publications, satisfying Article 7(1) EUDR.
  • It found visible differences in hook number, hook curvature, proportions, colour, and available views, so none of the earlier designs was identical within Article 5(2); the application was rejected and costs awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130884

vs Yigen Yang

2026-04-02Art 25(1)(b)087
000130703

vs Biwei Lin

2026-03-23Art 25(1)(b)087
000129381

vs EQUIPMOTOR LOCOMOTION DIRECT

2026-02-23Art 25(1)(b)087
000130727

vs Qiang Qian

2026-01-27Art 25(1)(b)087
000114141

vs M&T 1997,a.s.

2025-12-15Art 25(1)(b)087
000126676

vs GH Holding Bjerre ApS

2025-09-10Art 25(1)(b)087
000125985

vs Best on Bolt GmbH

2025-05-28Art 25(1)(b)087
000125981

vs Best on Bolt GmbH

2025-02-24Art 25(1)(b)087