DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015084431-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-01-26

000129841

Contested design: 015084431-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 720 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015084431-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Yanqing Luovia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Hezhou City, Guangxi Province, China

Holder · RCD owner

Suzhou Kingbow Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd

China (CN)

Suzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China

Represented by

Maria Ioannides

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

cordless vacuum cleaners

EU design registration No 008825384-0001 · EU Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2022-01-17

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on an earlier published EU design for cordless vacuum cleaners.
  • The holder argued the prior design lacked a battery pack and differed in proportions, handle geometry, and surface details, producing a different overall impression.
  • The Division found the earlier EU design was properly disclosed before the filing date and that designer freedom for vacuum cleaners was at least average.
  • It held the claimed differences were minor, presentation-related, or concerned detachable or secondary details, while the shared structure and silhouette dominated.
  • The application was upheld under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(1)(b) EUDR, and the contested design was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

15.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132204

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000132185

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000132064

vs Han Sheng

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131827

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131826

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131787

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131088

vs ZhiAo Zhou

2026-03-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000130362

vs Shenzhen Xiafang Technology Co., Ltd

2025-12-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158