DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015061211-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-01-27

000130726

Contested design: 015061211-0002

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 720 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 0150612110002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Ningbo Conxin Electromechanical Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province, China

Represented by

Shoosmiths Europe LLP

Holder · RCD owner

Qiang Qian

China (CN)

Wufengpu Town, Shaoyang County, Hunan Province, China

Represented by

Jesús Eladio Sánchez Silva

Prior art cited (5)

National designAnnex 2

caulking gun housing

CN 307024777 S · China National Intellectual Property Administration · disclosed 2021-12-24

National designAnnex 3

multifunctional caulking gun

CN 308046871 S · China · disclosed 2023-05-23

National designAnnex 4

glue gun

CN 306429795 S · China · disclosed 2021-04-02

National designAnnex 5

sealant gun

CN 307574099 S · China · disclosed 2022-09-30

National designAnnex 6

glue gun

CN 308827075 S · China · disclosed 2022-09-30

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over earlier Chinese design patent CN 307024777 S and argued designers retained substantial freedom for glue and caulking guns.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the earlier Chinese design patent had been validly disclosed and that the coinciding housing, handle, trigger and colour features dominated the overall impression.
  • The barrel and rod differences were constrained and insufficient to change the informed user's overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

08.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131944

vs Jinsong Liu

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000128757

vs Axue Jin

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127246

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127279

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127243

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127245

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127244

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088
000127241

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)088