DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015066760-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-02-13

000130847

Contested design: 015066760-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 720.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 0150667600001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Societe Bic, société anonymevia PDF extraction

France (FR)

Clichy, France

Represented by

In Concreto

Holder · RCD owner

Ying Caovia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Qinhuangdao City, Hebei Province, China

Prior art cited (5)

PublicationAnnex 3

BIC J26 Maxi Lighter leaflet depicting a dark blue flint maxi lighter

BIC Australia Pty Ltd leaflet (copyright notice ©2012)

Web disclosureAnnex 6-2

Screenshot showing the dark blue flint lighter

https://mybiclighter.com · Internet Archive Wayback Machine · disclosed 2015-02-20

PublicationAnnex 10

BiC Lighters Europe brochure including BIC J26 Maxi Lighter

BiC Lighters Europe brochure

PublicationAnnex 11

BiC 40 Years, you lights you brochure with BIC lighters timeline

BiC 40 Years, you lights you brochure

CatalogAnnex 12

BiC European Lighter Catalogue 2016 showing BIC maxi lighter and J26 Flint Lighters

BiC European Lighter Catalogue 2016

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on longstanding disclosures of its BIC J26 maxi lighter in catalogues, brochures and on the internet.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the combined annexes sufficiently proved prior disclosure of the dark blue BIC J26 maxi lighter before the contested design’s filing date.
  • Given the designer’s at least average freedom, the contested design created the same overall impression as the prior lighter and lacked individual character.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 720 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

27.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000125137

vs Shenzhen Olit Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-12-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000127919

vs Benxi Fenghe Lighter Co., Ltd

2025-05-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000124395

vs Xin Lu

2025-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000126756

vs SHENZHEN KAIWEILI DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2024-12-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000126655

vs Feoba Tech Limited

2024-12-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000126656

vs Feoba Tech Limited

2024-12-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000126597

vs Feoba Tech Limited

2024-12-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278
000121874

vs Benxi Fenghe Lighter Co., Ltd

2023-11-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)278