DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015028138-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-05-06

000129804

Contested design: 015028138-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 720.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015028138-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Piotr Moskałavia PDF extraction

Austria (AT)

Wien, Austria

Represented by

Tomasz Maziarz

Holder · RCD owner

Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

Poland (PL)

Łysa Góra, Poland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Decorative Panel L0106 Slat, Classic Oak Wood Effect

https://kreadecor.com · Internet Archive / kreadecor.com · disclosed 2022-06-30

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that identical decorative panels had been publicly disclosed before the filing date, notably via an archived 30/06/2022 kreadecor.com page, and that the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The holder argued the design was independently developed as a novel composite-panel solution, highlighted its customisation and durability, and submitted images and concept material on its creation.
  • The Division accepted the Internet Archive evidence as sufficient proof of disclosure and treated the earlier panel design as made available to the public before 18/07/2023.
  • The Division found the shared front-view arrangement of vertical wood-effect slats against a dark background created the same overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberGailé SAKALAITE-ORLOVSKIENE
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124779

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258