DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 000227327-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-05-08

000129441

Contested design: 000227327-0002

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity against EU design No. 000227327-0002 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen EU-Geschmacksmusters Nr. 000227327-0002 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Der Antragsteller trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Robert Büttnervia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Sonneberg, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

Brain Flash-Patententwicklungs GmbH

Austria (AT)

Lienz, Österreich

Prior art cited (2)

Patent

European patent of the holder cited to show the technical function of the contested filter design

EP 1 492 609 B1

Patent

European patent figures cited to show the technical function of the contested filter design

EP 3 129 122 B1

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested filter design consisted solely of features dictated by technical function and therefore lacked individual character.
  • The holder replied that the application was insufficiently reasoned on several grounds and that the cited patents did not prove all visible features were exclusively technical.
  • The Invalidity Division found that at least the front opening pattern reflected design choice, so Article 8(1) did not invalidate the design as a whole.
  • Because the contested design created a different overall impression and the evidence did not support the pleaded grounds, the invalidity application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberIvan PRANDZHEV
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
  • MemberIvo TSENKOV

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

15.09

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129421

vs Brain Flash-Patententwicklungs GmbH

2026-05-08Art 25(1)(b)157
000129368

vs Brain Flash-Patententwicklungs GmbH

2026-05-06Art 25(1)(b)157
000125796

vs Jiangxi Huawu Brake Co., Ltd.

2024-11-26Art 25(1)(b)157
000125799

vs Jiangxi Huawu Brake Co., Ltd.

2024-11-26Art 25(1)(b)157
000125777

vs Jiangxi Huawu Brake Co., Ltd.

2024-11-26Art 25(1)(b)157
000125735

vs Jiangxi Huawu Brake Co., Ltd.

2024-11-26Art 25(1)(b)157
000121425

vs Guido Valentini

2023-12-22Art 25(1)(b)157
000114111

vs MASCHIO GASPARDO S.p.A.

2022-01-04Art 25(1)(b)157