DesignVerdict
← Back to search
Contested design 015065947-0006

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-06-04

000132507

Contested design: 015065947-0006

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; registered EU design No 015065947-0006 is declared invalid; the holder bears the costs fixed at EUR 720.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015065947-0006 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

IP Central GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

München, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Hangzhou Deelux Lighting CO., LTD.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Represented by

Mon Yin Lin

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Septpenta LED Tischlampe (mushroom-shaped LED table lamp)

ASIN B0C2HZ5MZ3, https://www.amazon.de · Amazon.de · disclosed 2023-04-14

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested table lamp design (filed 09/07/2024) lacked novelty and individual character compared to the 'Septpenta LED Tischlampe' disclosed on Amazon.de since 14/04/2023, citing identical mushroom-like overall shape (rounded dome top, cylindrical base) and similar proportions.
  • Holder did not submit observations.
  • The Division found the designer enjoyed a wide degree of freedom for table lamp design, compared the designs and found them to coincide in all dominant features (mushroom-like shape, dome top, cylindrical base, height-to-width ratio, circular button on base front); the differences (minor button shape variation, dark ring at base edge in prior design only, colour/surface finish) had limited impact on the overall impression.
  • Application upheld; the contested lamp design lacks individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR; the holder bears EUR 720 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberGailé SAKALAITE-ORLOVSKIENE
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132506

vs Realty smart sl

2026-06-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268