DesignVerdict
← Back to search
Contested design 015087259-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-06-05

000132585

Contested design: 015087259-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; registered EU design No 015087259-0001 is declared invalid; the holder bears the costs fixed at EUR 720.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015087259-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Yongqi Gongvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Xiantao City, Hubei Province, China

Holder · RCD owner

Le Zhaovia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Shenzhen, China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

contoured memory-foam pillow with recessed middle section and quilted/honeycomb-textured cover

ASIN B0DB4W3B2K, https://www.amazon.com · Amazon.com · disclosed 2024-08-19

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested pillow design (filed 03/01/2025) lacked novelty and individual character compared to a prior pillow design disclosed on Amazon.com since 19/08/2024, citing identical overall contoured shape with recessed middle section and quilted outer cover.
  • Holder did not submit observations.
  • The Division found wide designer freedom for pillows, then compared the designs and found them to coincide in overall shape, contoured structure, centrally recessed middle section, darker colour areas on the sides and middle, soft material appearance, and quilted/honeycomb-textured cover; minor shape variations were imperceptible at first glance and did not alter the fundamental structure.
  • Application upheld; the contested pillow design lacks individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR; the holder bears EUR 720 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberGailé SAKALAITE-ORLOVSKIENE
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.09

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068