DesignVerdict
← Back to search
Contested design 009094220-0006

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-06-15

000132645

Contested design: 009094220-0006

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and registered EU design No 009094220-0006 is declared invalid; the holder bears the costs fixed at EUR 720.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 009094220-0006 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Kasper Teodor Toeplitzvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

Paris, France

Holder · RCD owner

Meihong Chen

Spain (ES)

Sevilla, Spain

Represented by

Eberhard Jorg Trempel

Prior art cited (1)

Patent

wireless remote control — black elongated slim rectangular body with rounded edges, multiple buttons including numeric keypad, navigation cluster, volume/channel controls, coloured shortcut buttons and red power button at top

CN 304432061 S · China (CNIPA), partial translation via EUIPO DesignView · disclosed 2017-12-29

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant (Kasper Teodor Toeplitz) argued that the contested wireless remote control design lacks individual character in view of Chinese design patent CN 304432061 S (published 29/12/2017), which pre-dates the contested design's filing date (22/07/2022) and shows the same overall black elongated slim rectangular body with similarly arranged button groups.
  • Holder did not submit observations.
  • The Division found the Chinese design patent duly disclosed per WIPO INID code 45 (29/12/2017), predating the filing date; both designs share the same overall structure — black elongated slim rectangular body with rounded edges and similarly arranged button layout including numeric keypad, navigation cluster, coloured shortcut keys and red power button; minor differences in button count, labelling and a 'HUAYU' wordmark are not clearly perceptible or of minor importance.
  • Application upheld; contested design declared invalid for lack of individual character under Article 6(1)(b) EUDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ-ORLOVSKIENĖ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

14.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130850

vs Michael AMARA

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131224

vs Shenzhen Ruixin Fengshuo Electronic Co., Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130970

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131064

vs Jinfeng Min

2026-02-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130524

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000129861

vs Liu yanqiong

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130564

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130565

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148