DesignVerdict
← Back to search
Contested design 015084590-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-06-30

000130707

Contested design: 015084590-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity of EU design No 015084590-0001 is rejected; the applicant bears the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered EU design No 015084590-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder's costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Gonge Creative Learning ApSvia PDF extraction

Denmark (DK)

Them, Denmark

Represented by

Patrade A/S

Holder · RCD owner

Yali YOU

China (CN)

Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China

Represented by

Metida

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

Apparatus for physical exercise control (balance toy)

EU design No 002418848-0002 · EU Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2014-03-11

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(d)

Argument summary

  • Applicant (owner of EU balance-toy design 002418848-0002, filed and published 2014) challenged children's rocking chair design 015084590-0001 under Article 25(1)(d) EUDR, arguing both designs share the same overall impression (rounded triangular seat, circular supporting frame, identical proportions) and the designer enjoys wide freedom.
  • Holder argued Article 25(1)(d) EUDR is a specific provision for prior designs published only after the contested design's filing date, and is legally distinct from the individual-character test; the prior design was published in 2014, over ten years before the contested design's 10/12/2024 filing date.
  • Division confirmed that Article 25(1)(d) EUDR covers only the specific scenario where the earlier design was applied for before, but published after, the contested design's filing date; here the earlier design was both applied for and published (11/03/2014) well before 10/12/2024, so the statutory conditions are plainly not met.
  • Application rejected as unfounded; Article 25(1)(d) ground not available.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130741

vs Yali YOU

2026-06-30Art 25(1)(d)067
000130725

vs Yali YOU

2026-06-30Art 25(1)(d)067
000122758

vs SAGAN FM GABRIELA WĄSALA SPÓŁKA KOMANDYTOWA

2026-01-28Art 25(1)(d)067
000121426

vs SMARTWOOD

2023-08-29Art 25(1)(d)067
000128557

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19065
000128656

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19065
000129371

vs joboo GmbH

2026-05-05065
000128978

vs Franco Ferri S.R.L.

2026-04-13065