DesignVerdict
← Back to search
Contested design 003851252-0005

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2020-03-17

R0483/2019-3

Contested design: 003851252-0005

CDRAppellant: applicant

Outcome

Discontinued / withdrawn

The appeal is noted as withdrawn; the invalidity applicant is ordered to bear the design holder's costs in the appeal proceedings; the appeal proceedings are terminated.

Show verbatim operative text

1. Takes note that the appeal has been withdrawn; 2. Orders that the invalidity applicant bears the costs incurred by the design holder in the appeal proceedings; 3. Terminates the appeal proceedings.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Tri Star Ltd

UA

Polevaya str. 5, Cherniakhovka village, Kirovograd region, Cherniakhovka, Ucrania

Represented by

Ionut Lupsa

Holder · RCD owner

Ionel-Alin Nita

Romania (RO)

Sos. Oltenitei 133, bl. 55, sc. 1, ap. 4, Bucuresti, Rumania

Represented by

Ruxandra Raluca Ardeleanu

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 59(1)Article 70(3)

Argument summary

  • Invalidity applicant (Tri Star Ltd) appealed the Invalidity Division's rejection of its invalidity application against RCD No 3 851 252-0005 (box packaging for confectionery).
  • The design holder did not file observations in reply to the appeal.
  • By communication dated 5 March 2020, the invalidity applicant withdrew its appeal; the Board took note and terminated the proceedings without examining the merits.
  • The invalidity applicant was ordered to bear the design holder's costs in the appeal proceedings.

Deciding panel

  • ChairTh. M. Margellos
  • RapporteurC. Rusconi
  • MemberH. Salmi
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R0234/2020-32020-07-09Without deciding on the meritsArt 70(3)5
R0453/2019-32020-03-17Without deciding on the meritsArt 70(3)5
R0455/2019-32020-03-17Without deciding on the meritsArt 70(3)5
R0451/2019-32020-03-17Without deciding on the meritsArt 70(3)5
R0452/2019-32020-03-17Without deciding on the meritsArt 70(3)5
R0454/2019-32020-03-17Without deciding on the meritsArt 70(3)5
R0523/2025-32025-07-15Closed without deciding on the meritsArt 70(3)4
R0476/2025-32025-06-05OtherArt 70(3)4