DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005822301-0001

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2020-07-09

R0234/2020-3

Contested design: 005822301-0001

CDRAppellant: applicant

Outcome

Discontinued / withdrawn

1. The appeal proceedings are closed due to withdrawal of the appeal; 2. The invalidity applicant bears the costs of the invalidity and appeal proceedings incurred by the design holder.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Das Beschwerdeverfahren wird aufgrund der Zurücknahme der Beschwerde eingestellt; 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die der Inhaberin entstandenen Kosten des Nichtigkeits- und des Beschwerdeverfahrens.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

MAC Mode GmbH & Co. KGaAvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Industriestr. 2, 93192 Wald/Roßbach, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

Reinhold Fleckenstein Jeanswear GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Maybachstr. 2, 72202 Nagold, Deutschland

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4

Argument summary

  • Applicant/appellant sought invalidity of RCD No 5822301-0001 (trousers) for lack of novelty and individual character under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 4 CDR; the Invalidity Division rejected the application on 29 November 2019.
  • Appellant filed the appeal on 29 January 2020 and submitted grounds on 26 March 2020; the holder was the respondent.
  • On 29 May 2020 the appellant withdrew the appeal, eliminating the basis for the appeal proceedings.
  • The Board closed the proceedings, confirmed the Invalidity Division decision (including costs against the applicant), and ordered the applicant to bear the holder's costs of the appeal proceedings under Article 70(3) CDR.

Deciding panel

  • ChairTh. M. Margellos
  • RapporteurE. Fink
  • MemberC. Bartos
  • Registrarp.o. M. Chaleva

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R0483/2019-32020-03-17Without deciding on the meritsArt 70(3)5
R0455/2019-32020-03-17Without deciding on the meritsArt 70(3)5
R0451/2019-32020-03-17Without deciding on the meritsArt 70(3)5
R0453/2019-32020-03-17Without deciding on the meritsArt 70(3)5
R0454/2019-32020-03-17Without deciding on the meritsArt 70(3)5
R0452/2019-32020-03-17Without deciding on the meritsArt 70(3)5
R0523/2025-32025-07-15Closed without deciding on the meritsArt 70(3)4
R0476/2025-32025-06-05OtherArt 70(3)4