DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001435499-0003

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2020-05-28

R0904/2018-3

Contested design: 001435499-0003

CDRAppellant: applicant

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The contested decision is set aside, RCD No. 1435499-0003 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the costs of the invalidity and appeal proceedings.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Die angefochtene Entscheidung wird aufgehoben; 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 1435499-0003 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Der Inhaber trägt die Kosten des Nichtigkeits- und des Beschwerde- verfahrens.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Küberit Profile Systems GmbH & Co. KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Römerweg 9, 58513 Lüdenscheid, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

Georg Sondermannvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Biggeseestr. 20a, 57489 Drolshagen, Deutschland

Represented by

V. BEZOLD & PARTNER

Prior art cited (2)

National designD1

floor rails / floor transition strip

German design No. 40200327-0001 · German Patent and Trade Mark Office Designblatt · disclosed 2002-06-25

National designD2

floor rails / floor transition strip

German design No. 40200327-0002 · German Patent and Trade Mark Office Designblatt · disclosed 2002-06-25

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(2)(a)Article 5Article 6(1)

Argument summary

  • The invalidity applicant argued that the contested floor-profile design lacked novelty and individual character, and that after installation only the visible top section matters; it also invoked older German designs D1 and D2.
  • The holder argued that the profile's 'goblet' or 'Sondro-S' perforation shape and possible visible uses of the base profile gave the contested design a different overall impression.
  • The Board refused to expand the case to newly introduced product lines, compared the contested RCD mainly with D1, and found the differences in perforation shape, hole placement, profile count and height too minor to affect the informed user's overall impression.
  • Because D1 destroyed individual character, the Board set aside the first-instance rejection and declared the contested RCD invalid; the holder was ordered to pay costs.

Deciding panel

  • ChairTh. M. Margellos
  • RapporteurE. Fink
  • MemberC. Rusconi
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R0905/2018-32020-10-29Decision annulledArt 25(1)(b), Art 4(2)7
R0907/2018-32020-10-29Decision annulledArt 25(1)(b), Art 4(2)7
R0906/2018-32020-05-28Decision annulledArt 25(1)(b), Art 4(2)7
R0763/2019-32020-05-20Decision annulledArt 25(1)(b), Art 4(2)7
R0914/2018-32020-10-29Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b), Art 4(2)6
R0912/2018-32020-10-29Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b), Art 4(2)6
R0913/2018-32020-10-29Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b), Art 4(2)6
R0911/2018-32020-05-28Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b), Art 4(2)6