DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001435499-0008

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2020-10-29

R0907/2018-3

Contested design: 001435499-0008

CDRAppellant: applicant

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The contested decision is set aside, RCD No. 1435499-0008 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the costs of the invalidity and appeal proceedings.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Die angefochtene Entscheidung wird aufgehoben; 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 1435499-0008 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Der Inhaber trägt die Kosten des Nichtigkeits- und des Beschwerde- verfahrens.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Küberit Profile Systems GmbH & Co. KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Römerweg 9, 58513 Lüdenscheid, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

Georg Sondermannvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Biggeseestr. 20a, 57489 Drolshagen, Deutschland

Represented by

V. BEZOLD & PARTNER

Prior art cited (2)

National designD1

floor rails / floor transition strip

German design No. 40200327-0001 · German Patent and Trade Mark Office Designblatt · disclosed 2002-06-25

National designD2

floor rails / floor transition strip

German design No. 40200327-0002 · German Patent and Trade Mark Office Designblatt · disclosed 2002-06-25

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(2)(a)Article 5Article 6(1)

Argument summary

  • The invalidity applicant argued that the contested floor-profile design lacked novelty and individual character over earlier German designs D1 and D2, and that only the visible upper profile is decisive after installation.
  • The holder argued that the profile curvature, perforation details, and possible visibility of the base profile generated a different overall impression.
  • The Board excluded additional prior designs introduced only on appeal and found that the remaining differences between the contested design and D2 were technically driven or too slight to affect the informed user’s overall impression.
  • The appeal succeeded; the first-instance decision was annulled, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to bear costs.

Deciding panel

  • ChairTh. M. Margellos
  • RapporteurE. Fink
  • MemberA. Szanyi Felkl
  • Registrarp.o. R. Vidal

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R0905/2018-32020-10-29Decision annulledArt 25(1)(b), Art 4(2)7
R0906/2018-32020-05-28Decision annulledArt 25(1)(b), Art 4(2)7
R0904/2018-32020-05-28Decision annulledArt 25(1)(b), Art 4(2)7
R0763/2019-32020-05-20Decision annulledArt 25(1)(b), Art 4(2)7
R0912/2018-32020-10-29Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b), Art 4(2)6
R0914/2018-32020-10-29Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b), Art 4(2)6
R0913/2018-32020-10-29Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b), Art 4(2)6
R0911/2018-32020-05-28Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b), Art 4(2)6