DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001972522-0001

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2021-06-03

R1304/2018-3

Contested design: 001972522-0001

CDRAppellant: applicant

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

The appeal is dismissed and the invalidity applicant is ordered to bear the design holder’s costs.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Desestimar el recurso; 2. Ordenar que la solicitante sufrague las costas de la titular.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Albero Forte Composite, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

C/ Marjal 61, 03450 Banyeres de Mariola (Alicante), España

Represented by

PADIMA

Holder · RCD owner

Aljuan, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

C/ Sevilla, s/n. - Pol. Ind. L'Alfaç, 03440 Ibi (Alicante), España

Represented by

Javier Ungría López

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • The invalidity applicant argued that the food-container design was excluded from protection because all of its features of appearance were solely dictated by technical function under Article 8(1) CDR.
  • The design holder defended the registration, relying on the decorative character of several features and on technical and judicial materials showing that alternative forms existed.
  • The Board found that, although certain features improved the product’s function, the overall shapes, proportions, edges, and visual presentation could also have been chosen for aesthetic appeal.
  • The appeal was dismissed and the invalidity applicant was ordered to bear costs.

Deciding panel

  • ChairG. Humphreys
  • MemberS. Rizzo
  • MemberH. Salmi
  • Registrarp.o. R. Vidal

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R1395/2025-32026-04-28Decision confirmedArt 8(1)3
R1394/2025-32026-04-28Decision confirmedArt 8(1)3
R1826/2025-32026-04-22Decision confirmedArt 8(1)3
R0947/2025-32026-04-07Decision confirmedArt 8(1)3
R2089/2024-32025-08-22Decision confirmedArt 8(1)3
R2328/2024-32025-08-22Decision confirmedArt 8(1)3
R0204/2024-32025-06-04Decision confirmedArt 8(1)3
R0131/2024-32025-03-03Decision confirmedArt 8(1)3