← Back to representatives
Applicant-side representative
PADIMA
4 first-instance invalidity cases · 2018–2025 · 50% win rate
Cases
4
Invalidated
2
Lost
2
Win rate
50%
Median costs
€575
Win rate by year
2018
0%0/1 merits
2024
0%0/1 merits
2025
100%2/2 merits
Bar = win rate; faint right-hand bar = case volume that year.
Most-practised sectors
- 09Packages & containers2
- 08Tools & hardware1
- 19Stationery1
Most-invoked grounds
- Article 25(1)(b)4
- Article 6(1)(b)2
- Article 8(1)2
- Article 4(1)1
- Article 6(2)1
- Article 71
Most-represented clients
- Alberto Forte Composite S.L.1 case · 0/1 won
- Eversia, S.A.1 case · 1/1 won
- Hormicad Arquitectura de Hormigón, S.L.1 case · 0/1 won
- Nurdim Bumedien Mohamedi1 case · 1/1 won
Most-frequent opposing parties
- ALJUAN S.L.1 case · prevailed 1×
- Exclusivas Nimbus, S.L.1 case
- FHU Jarosław Wolski1 case
- Pretensados Durán, S. L.1 case · prevailed 1×
Most-frequent opposing holder-side firms
- Baylos1 case
- Iglobax1 case · they prevailed 1×
- Kancelaria Patentowa Aneta Balwierz-Michalska1 case