DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006379293-0003

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2022-04-04

R0968/2021-3

Contested design: 006379293-0003

CDRAppellant: holdermedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

The appeal is dismissed, and the appellant must bear the respondent's costs.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Die Beschwerde wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Beschwerdeführerin trägt die Kosten der Beschwerdegegnerin.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Suolificio Antares S.r.l.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Carlo Alberto Dalla Chiesa, 63024 Grottazzolina, Italien

Represented by

Massimo Maccagnani

Holder · RCD owner

Calzaturificio Donna Carolina S.r.l.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Vicolo Mascagni N. 1, 30032 Fiesso D’Artico, Italien

Represented by

Weber & Sauberschwarz

Prior art cited (1)

Prior useD1

Sole model for footwear

Art. Vekic · emails, invoices and photographs relating to the 'Art. Vekic' sole model

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)

Argument summary

  • The design holder appealed the invalidation, disputing the evidential value and prior disclosure of the 'Art. Vekic' sole model and contesting the finding of lack of individual character.
  • The invalidity applicant relied on invoices, emails, photos and other documents to show prior disclosure of the 'Art. Vekic' sole and argued that the contested outsole gave the same overall impression.
  • The Board upheld the first-instance assessment that the prior sole had been made available to the public before the filing date and that the minor differences did not alter the very similar overall impression of the multilayer sole designs.
  • The appeal was dismissed and the invalidation of the contested RCD remained in place.

Deciding panel

  • ChairG. Humphreys
  • RapporteurC. Bartos
  • MemberE. Fink
  • RegistrarH.Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R0181/2025-32025-05-27Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R0827/2024-32025-03-10Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1336/2024-32025-03-03Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R0797/2024-32025-01-16Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1123/2021-32024-12-10Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1125/2021-32024-12-10Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1124/2021-32024-12-10Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1015/2024-32024-11-07Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5