DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 000363486-0020

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2024-12-10

R1124/2021-3

Contested design: 000363486-0020

CDRAppellant: holder

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

The appeal is dismissed, and the holder of the RCD is ordered to bear the fees and costs incurred by the invalidity applicant.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

Desestimar el recurso. Ordenar que la titular del DMC sufrague las tasas y las costas sufragadas por la solicitante de nulidad.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

CANALONES NOVOKANAL, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Calle de Huelva, 6 Nave 5, Pol. Ind. La Carrehuela, 28343 Valdemoro (Madrid), España

Represented by

Ungría López

Holder · RCD owner

CANALONES CASTILLA S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Calle Embalse n°5, 28607 El Alamo (Madrid), España

Prior art cited (1)

CatalogAnexos 2-4

Prior gutter/downpipe profile shown in Canalón, S.A. price catalogs

Tarifas de precios de CANALÓN, S. A. (COBRE, ZINC TITATIO y ACERO) · CANALÓN, S. A.

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 6(2)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The holder appealed, arguing the earlier disclosure was not properly proven and the contested design should remain valid.
  • The invalidity applicant relied on April 2004 Canalón price catalogs and an expert report to show prior disclosure and no different overall impression.
  • The Board found the third-party price catalogs reliable commercial evidence and sufficient to prove prior disclosure before 27 June 2005.
  • Given broad designer freedom for gutters, the minor groove differences did not alter the overall impression on the informed user.
  • The appeal was dismissed; the RCD remained invalid and the holder was ordered to bear the fees and costs.

Deciding panel

  • ChairG. Humphreys Bacon
  • RapporteurH. Salmi
  • MemberS. Rizzo
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R0181/2025-32025-05-27Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R0827/2024-32025-03-10Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1336/2024-32025-03-03Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R0797/2024-32025-01-16Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1123/2021-32024-12-10Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1125/2021-32024-12-10Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1015/2024-32024-11-07Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R0252/2024-32024-11-05Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5