DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008932099-0005

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2024-11-05

R0252/2024-3

Contested design: 008932099-0005

CDRAppellant: holder

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

The appeal is dismissed, and the design holder must bear the costs and fees incurred by the invalidity applicant in the invalidity and appeal proceedings.

Show verbatim operative text

1. Dismisses the appeal. 2. Orders the design holder to bear the costs and fees incurred by the invalidity applicant in the invalidity and appeal proceedings.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Velyo Velevvia PDF extraction

Bulgaria (BG)

32, Tzar Simeon Ist 9000 Varna Bulgaria

Represented by

Andrej Bukovnik

Holder · RCD owner

Yuyao Hilite Electric Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

CE23, Far East Industrial Park 315400 Yuyao City - Zhejiang Prov China

Represented by

Mondial Marchi S.p.a.

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

desk lamps

Community design registration No 8 505 580-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2021-04-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The design holder appealed, arguing the lamp design was new and had individual character because of differences in the cap, base, stem, and underside.
  • The invalidity applicant filed no observations in reply before the Board.
  • The Board accepted prior disclosure of the earlier RCD, found broad design freedom for lamps, and held the identified differences too minor to alter the overall impression.
  • The Board confirmed lack of individual character, dismissed the appeal, and ordered the design holder to bear the invalidity applicant's costs and fees.

Deciding panel

  • ChairS. Stürmann
  • RapporteurA. Pohlmann
  • MemberH. Salmi
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R0181/2025-32025-05-27Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R0827/2024-32025-03-10Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1336/2024-32025-03-03Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R0797/2024-32025-01-16Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1123/2021-32024-12-10Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1125/2021-32024-12-10Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1124/2021-32024-12-10Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1015/2024-32024-11-07Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5