DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002631580-0001

Other appeal · Board of Appeal · 2022-05-24

R0934/2021-3

Contested design: 002631580-0001

Appellant: holdermedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Restitutio refused

The request for restitutio in integrum is rejected, the appeal is deemed not to have been filed, and the appeal fee is reimbursed.

Show verbatim operative text

1. Rejects the application for restitutio in integrum; 2. Declares that the appeal is deemed not to have been filed; 3. Orders the reimbursement of the appeal fee.

CostsNo costs order

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Ceská zbrojovka a.s.via PDF extraction

Czechia (CZ)

Svatopluka Cecha 1283, 688 27 Uherský Brod, Czech Republic

Holder · RCD owner

Czech Small Armsvia PDF extraction

Czechia (CZ)

Jablunka 651, 756 23 Jabkunka, Czech Republic

Legal grounds invoked

Article 67Article 57Article 35(3)

Argument summary

  • After losing the invalidity case, the design holder sought restitutio in integrum for the late payment of the appeal fee and argued that a payment order had been placed with the bank.
  • There is no opposing party in the heading, but the decision records that the invalidity application had been filed by Ceská zbrojovka a.s.
  • The Board held that the design holder provided no adequate proof that the payment order had been duly made within the appeal period and no evidence showing that all due care had been exercised.
  • The restitutio request was rejected, the appeal was deemed not to have been filed and the appeal fee was reimbursed.

Deciding panel

  • ChairG. Humphreys
  • MemberE. Fink
  • MemberC. Bartos
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R0936/2021-32022-05-24Appeal deemed not filedArt 35(3)5
R0935/2021-32022-05-24Appeal deemed not filedArt 35(3)5
R2380/2020-32021-03-15Appeal deemed not filedArt 35(3)5
R0512/2019-32019-06-20Appeal deemed not filedArt 35(3)5
R0511/2019-32019-06-06Appeal deemed not filedArt 35(3)5
R1129/2024-32024-09-06Appeal deemed not filedArt 35(3)3
R1129/2024-32024-09-06Appeal deemed not filedArt 35(3)3
R1719/2020-32020-11-19Appeal deemed not filedArt 35(3)3