DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006373189-0001

Other appeal · Board of Appeal · 2022-05-24

R0935/2021-3

Contested design: 006373189-0001

Appellant: holder

Outcome

Restitutio refused

The request for restitutio in integrum is rejected, the appeal is deemed not to have been filed, and the appeal fee is reimbursed.

Show verbatim operative text

1. Rejects the application for restitutio in integrum; 2. Declares that the appeal is deemed not to have been filed; 3. Orders the reimbursement of the appeal fee.

CostsNo costs order

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Ceská zbrojovka a.s.via PDF extraction

Czechia (CZ)

Svatopluka Cecha 1283, 688 27 Uherský Brod, Czech Republic

Holder · RCD owner

Czech Small Armsvia PDF extraction

Czechia (CZ)

Jablunka 651, 756 23 Jabkunka, Czech Republic

Legal grounds invoked

Article 67Article 57Article 35(3)

Argument summary

  • After the Invalidity Division invalidated the RCD, the design holder filed an appeal but paid the appeal fee late and then sought restitutio in integrum.
  • The design holder argued that all due care had been exercised because a payment order had been made to the bank, while the invalidity applicant remained the opposing party in the underlying invalidity dispute.
  • The Board held that no sufficient proof of timely payment instructions or of an adequate due-care system had been produced, so the requirements for restitutio in integrum were not met.
  • The request for restitutio was rejected, the appeal was deemed not to have been filed and the appeal fee was reimbursed.

Deciding panel

  • ChairG. Humphreys
  • MemberE. Fink
  • MemberC. Bartos
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R0936/2021-32022-05-24Appeal deemed not filedArt 35(3)5
R0934/2021-32022-05-24Appeal deemed not filedArt 35(3)5
R2380/2020-32021-03-15Appeal deemed not filedArt 35(3)5
R0512/2019-32019-06-20Appeal deemed not filedArt 35(3)5
R0511/2019-32019-06-06Appeal deemed not filedArt 35(3)5
R1129/2024-32024-09-06Appeal deemed not filedArt 35(3)3
R1129/2024-32024-09-06Appeal deemed not filedArt 35(3)3
R1719/2020-32020-11-19Appeal deemed not filedArt 35(3)3