DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006307666-0001

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2022-10-03

R0045/2022-3

Contested design: 006307666-0001

CDRAppellant: holder

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

The appeal is dismissed, and the costs incurred by the invalidity applicant in the invalidity and appeal proceedings are charged to the holders.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. Il ricorso è respinto; 2. Le spese sostenute dalla richiedente nei procedimenti di nullità e di ricorso sono poste a carico dei titolari.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

CreativaMente S.r.l.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Alessandro Volta, 69, 20863 Concorezzo (MB), Italia

Represented by

AL & Partners S.r.l.

Holder · RCD owner

Luca Achinovia PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Baldo, 3, 13866 Masserano (BI), Italia

Represented by

A.Bre.Mar S.r.l.

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAllegati 2-3

3D origami modular-card kits, including the turtle Origami 3D kit

http://www.3dorigami.it / Internet Archive captures and corresponding box/instructions · 3dorigami.it website / Wayback Machine / product packaging · disclosed 2017-03-09

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6

Argument summary

  • The holders argued that their origami-paper design had individual character through specific side cuts and raised lower angles and that the prior modular card kit did not create the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The invalidity applicant maintained that modular origami cards with the same essential shape had already been disclosed in 2016 and 2017 on the 3dorigami.it site and packaging, leaving only immaterial differences.
  • The Board held that the earlier disclosure was established and that the small differences relied on by the holders were insufficient, given the wide design freedom and the informed user's global perception, to create a different overall impression.
  • The appeal was dismissed and the invalidity decision was confirmed.

Deciding panel

  • ChairG. Humphreys
  • RapporteurC. Negro
  • MemberS. Rizzo
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R0181/2025-32025-05-27Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R0827/2024-32025-03-10Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1336/2024-32025-03-03Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R0797/2024-32025-01-16Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1123/2021-32024-12-10Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1125/2021-32024-12-10Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1124/2021-32024-12-10Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1015/2024-32024-11-07Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5