DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002684043-0002

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2022-12-09

R1589/2021-3

Contested design: 002684043-0002

CDRAppellant: holder

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

The appeal is dismissed and the design holder must bear the invalidity applicant’s costs in the invalidity and appeal proceedings.

Show verbatim operative text

1. Dismisses the appeal; 2. Orders the design holder to bear the costs incurred by the invalidity applicant in the invalidity and appeal proceedings.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Anne Germannvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Düsseldorf, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

SunPower Corporationvia PDF extraction

United States (US)

San Jose, California, United States

Prior art cited (4)

Registered RCDD1

solar panels

RCD 2032581-0005 · Office Bulletin · disclosed 2012-05-07

Registered RCDD2

solar panels

RCD 34350-0001

Registered RCDD3

solar panels

RCD 1386056-0001

Registered RCDD4

solar panels

RCD 1955030-0002

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 6Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • The invalidity applicant argued that the solar-panel design was technically dictated and, in any event, lacked novelty and individual character over earlier RCDs, especially D1.
  • The design holder replied that the horizontal light lines, dark back sheet and reflective surface gave the panel a distinctive and not purely functional appearance.
  • The Board held that D1 destroyed individual character because the common rectangular panel, six-column arrangement and dark framing elements dominated over the minor differences.
  • The appeal was dismissed and costs were awarded against the design holder.

Deciding panel

  • ChairG. Humphreys
  • RapporteurC. Bartos
  • MemberS. Rizzo
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R0181/2025-32025-05-27Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R0827/2024-32025-03-10Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1336/2024-32025-03-03Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R0797/2024-32025-01-16Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1124/2021-32024-12-10Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1123/2021-32024-12-10Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1125/2021-32024-12-10Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1015/2024-32024-11-07Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5