DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004352300-0009

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2023-09-26

R0540/2023-3

Contested design: 004352300-0009

CDRAppellant: holdermedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

The appeal is dismissed; the design holder must bear the costs of the invalidity and appeal proceedings.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Die Beschwerde wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die GGM-Inhaberin trägt die Kosten des Nichtigkeits- und Beschwerdeverfahrens.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Plásticos Industriales y Comerciales de Alfarrasi, S.L. Picdavia PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Crta. Nacional 340, S/N, 46893 Alfarrasi, Spanien

Represented by

Garrigues IP, S.L.P

Holder · RCD owner

Papier-Mettler KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Hochwaldstrasse 22, 54497 Morbach, Deutschland

Prior art cited (7)

Web disclosureD1

carrier bag

YouTube · disclosed 2017-04-06

OtherD2

earlier carrier bag design

OtherD3

earlier carrier bag design

OtherD4

earlier carrier bag design

OtherD5

earlier carrier bag design

OtherD6

earlier carrier bag design

OtherD7

earlier carrier bag design

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The invalidity applicant sought cancellation for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier carrier-bag disclosures labelled D1 to D7.
  • The design holder argued D1 did not negate novelty or individual character, stressing differences in surface texture, colour, handle attachment and overall proportions.
  • The Board upheld the finding that D1 had been disclosed before filing and that the compared bags created the same overall impression despite minor colour and seam differences.
  • The appeal was dismissed and the invalidity decision remained in force.

Deciding panel

  • ChairG. Humphreys
  • RapporteurA. Pohlmann
  • MemberE. Fink
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R0181/2025-32025-05-27Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R0827/2024-32025-03-10Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1336/2024-32025-03-03Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R0797/2024-32025-01-16Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1124/2021-32024-12-10Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1123/2021-32024-12-10Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1125/2021-32024-12-10Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5
R1015/2024-32024-11-07Decision confirmedArt 25(1)(b)5