← Back to search
Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2024-01-24
R2384/2023-3
Contested design: 002286708-0004
CDRAppellant: holder
Outcome
Appeal inadmissible
The appeal is rejected as inadmissible.
Show verbatim operative text(es)
Denegar el recurso por inadmisible.
CostsNo costs order
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Laboratoires Filorga Cosmetiquesvia PDF extraction
France (FR)
2-4 rue de Lisbonne, 75008 Paris, Francia
Represented by
Holder · RCD owner
Aniceto Canamasas Puigbovia PDF extraction
Spain (ES)
Avenida de la Fama, 129, 08940 Cornella de Llobregat, Barcelona, España
Represented by
Legal grounds invoked
Art 35(1)Article 56 CDRArt 35(3)Art 35(3)
From EUIPO API metadata.
Argument summary
- ›The invalidity division had already dismissed the invalidity application in full, yet the design holder filed an appeal against that favourable decision.
- ›The Registry warned that the holder did not appear to be adversely affected and invited comments, but the holder only asked for reimbursement of the appeal fee.
- ›The Board held that only a party adversely affected within the meaning of Article 56 CDR may appeal, so the holder lacked standing and the appeal was inadmissible.
- ›The Board also refused to reimburse the appeal fee.
Deciding panel
- ChairS. Stürmann
- RapporteurS. Rizzo
- MemberC. Negro
- RegistrarE. Wagner
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| enEnglish (en) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| ititaliano (it) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| esSpanish | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2945/2019-3 | 2020-08-14 | Appeal inadmissible | Art 35(1) | — | 5 |
| R1883/2017-3 | 2018-06-01 | Appeal inadmissible | Art 35(1) | — | 5 |
| R1101/2024-3 | 2024-11-13 | Closed without deciding on the merits | Art 35(1) | — | 4 |
| R1129/2024-3 | 2024-09-06 | Appeal deemed not filed | Art 35(3) | — | 4 |
| R1129/2024-3 | 2024-09-06 | Appeal deemed not filed | Art 35(3) | — | 4 |
| R0280/2024-3 | 2024-05-13 | Closed without deciding on the merits | Art 35(3) | — | 4 |
| R1719/2020-3 | 2020-11-19 | Appeal deemed not filed | Art 35(3) | — | 4 |
| R1172/2022-3 | 2022-12-02 | Appeal inadmissible | Art 35(1) | — | 3 |