DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003086735-0001

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2020-08-14

R2945/2019-3

Contested design: 003086735-0001

CDRAppellant: applicant

Outcome

Appeal inadmissible

The appeal is dismissed as inadmissible and the appellant must bear the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Die Beschwerde wird als unzulässig zurückgewiesen. 2. Der Beschwerdeführer trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Attila Nagyvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Beckhauser Straße 12, 40699 Erkrath, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

LT Fördertechnik GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Stuttgarter Straße 23, 74211 Leingarten, Deutschland

Represented by

MEYER & MEYER

Legal grounds invoked

Article 34(1)(a)Article 35(1)Article 35(2)Article 56Article 70(1)

Argument summary

  • The invalidity applicant appealed the rejection of his invalidity request against the modular conveyor design.
  • The appeal statement of grounds identified 'LOG-X Systems GmbH' on its first page even though that company was neither the invalidity applicant nor the appellant, and the filing did not make clear in whose name the grounds were lodged.
  • After the Registry asked for clarification, no response was filed; the Board held that the statement of grounds either failed to identify the filing party as required or was filed by a party without standing.
  • The appeal was declared inadmissible and the invalidity applicant was ordered to bear the appeal costs.

Deciding panel

  • ChairTh. M. Margellos
  • RapporteurC. Bartos
  • MemberA. Szanyi Felkl
  • Registrarp.o. M. Chaleva

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R2384/2023-32024-01-24Appeal inadmissibleArt 35(1)5
R1883/2017-32018-06-01Appeal inadmissibleArt 35(1)5
R1101/2024-32024-11-13Closed without deciding on the meritsArt 35(1)4
R1172/2022-32022-12-02Appeal inadmissibleArt 35(1)3
R1171/2022-32022-11-30Appeal inadmissibleArt 35(1)3
R2022/2021-32022-06-21Appeal inadmissibleArt 35(1)3
R0365/2021-32021-06-22Appeal inadmissibleArt 35(1)3
R0658/2020-32020-08-24Appeal inadmissibleArt 35(1)3